We’ve been covering Lucid‘s struggles all year, from production shortfalls to customer relations crises. Now, one of the most credible voices in automotive engineering is adding his own nightmare to the pile.

Jason Fenske, the mechanical engineer behind the 4-million-subscriber YouTube channel Engineering Explained, just published a devastating ownership report on his 2025 Lucid Air Touring. The verdict? “This car by an enormous margin is the most frustrating vehicle I have ever owned.”

What makes this particularly painful for Lucid is the source. Fenske bought the car specifically because he believes the Air is “one of the best engineered vehicles the world has ever seen.” He’s not a hater. He’s a true believer who’s been burned.

In less than six months and approximately 3,000 miles (4,828 km), Fenske has documented a staggering list of hardware failures, software bugs, and design flaws. Here’s everything that’s gone wrong.

2025 Lucid Air Touring: Key Specs

Hardware Problems: What Broke

Fenske’s Lucid has already required multiple service visits for issues that should have been caught at the factory.

Software Glitches: The Never-Ending Bugs

The software problems are relentless. Fenske describes the car as “riddled with software glitches and bugs.”

Design Flaws: Intentional Choices That Make No Sense

Beyond bugs, Fenske identified several deliberate design decisions that frustrate daily use.

The Biggest Problem: You Can’t Switch Profiles While Driving

Fenske’s single biggest complaint illustrates how hardware and software failures compound each other.

Lucid offers two ways to automatically detect the driver: phone key recognition and a biometric face scanner. Neither works reliably.

Photo credit: Engineering Explained

The phone key can’t distinguish which side of the car you’re entering from. If two people approach together, it’s essentially a coin flip whose profile loads.

The face scanner is mounted behind the steering wheel. But Fenske is tall, so he raises the wheel to see the display, which completely blocks the scanner. A hardware design choice renders a software feature worthless.

The result? If you drive off on the wrong profile, you cannot switch while moving. Lucid’s legal department apparently prohibited this because moving the seat back could be dangerous. But the alternative, Fenske points out, is adjusting steering and mirrors through a touchscreen while driving. “That’s the safe alternative,” he says sarcastically.

Worse, even when you manually switch profiles while parked, it sometimes only loads partial settings, mixing seat positions from one profile with mirror settings from another.

Photo credit: Engineering Explained

The Latest Software Update Didn’t Help

After finally receiving a software update, Fenske took a 2-mile (3.2 km) drive to drop off his dog. Here’s what happened:

  1. Driver profile only half-loaded, blocking the display
  2. Had to park and manually switch profiles twice (took about a minute)
  3. Profile switching disconnected Apple CarPlay
  4. Had to reconnect CarPlay
  5. Screen went completely black half a mile from the destination
  6. Lost navigation for the remainder of the drive
“This all happened in the course of 2 miles in a car that has been out for about 4 years now,” Fenske says. “There is no reason the software should be this bad this late in its development.”

The Parking Ticket That Proves a Point

In a moment of dark humor, Fenske shares a parking ticket he received. Two details stand out.

First, the make is listed as “unidentifiable.” Lucid’s brand recognition problem, documented.

Second, Lucid calls his paint color “blue.” The ticket says “gray.” Fenske sides with the parking officer.

Photo credit: Engineering Explained

EVXL’s Take

This video lands at the worst possible time for Lucid.

Just two weeks ago, U.S. News named Lucid the Best Luxury EV Brand for 2025, ranking it above Tesla, Porsche, and BMW. The Gravity SUV scored a perfect 10 out of 10. The Air was praised for “mind-blowing acceleration” and “some of the highest ratings for efficiency on the market.”

Now one of YouTube’s most respected automotive engineers, a mechanical engineer who specifically bought the car because he believed in Lucid’s engineering, is cataloging dozens of failures within 3,000 miles.

This pattern is becoming impossible to ignore. We’ve been tracking Lucid’s operational struggles all year. In November, the company slashed its 2025 production forecast to 18,000 vehicles amid what interim CEO Marc Winterhoff called a “Whac-A-Mole” of supply chain disruptions.

The same month, we reported on Lucid facing backlash over $7,600 lease-end bills for minor cosmetic damage, with customers describing a “bureaucratic maze” of third-party inspectors and unclear policies.

Earlier this year, Lucid’s VP of Engineering James Hawkins touted the company’s philosophy of “doing more with less” and building the most efficient EVs on the planet. That engineering excellence is real. The 2025 Air Pure achieves an industry-leading 5 miles per kWh.

But brilliant hardware engineering means nothing if the software makes the car unusable. Fenske’s experience mirrors complaints from Lucid owners across forums: profile switching issues, phone key failures, frozen screens, and audio dropouts.

The comparison to Tesla is inevitable. Tesla has its own quality problems, but its software, for all its controversies, generally works. Lucid is trying to compete with Tesla on hardware while trailing badly on software maturity. That gap is showing.

As Fenske puts it: “I have a cheap Amazon USB stick that turns wired CarPlay into wireless CarPlay. This thing has been bulletproof. Far more reliable than the CarPlay in my Lucid.”

That’s the most damning sentence in the entire video. A $78,900 luxury sedan is being outperformed by a $30 accessory.

Lucid’s survival depends on the upcoming mid-size platform and hitting volume production targets. But volume won’t matter if early adopters like Fenske, people who genuinely want the company to succeed, are documenting ownership nightmares for millions of viewers.

Software can be fixed. The question is whether Lucid can fix it fast enough before its reputation is irreparably damaged.

What do you think? Have you experienced similar issues with your Lucid Air? Share your thoughts in the comments below.